搞定了！太不容易了。我才不想裝著一腦子便秘和糞便菌落來度假。但是，一朝做了審稿人，永遠都是審稿人，到哪兒都是審稿人。在科學(xué)研究的荒漠中，我們是勇敢的童子軍。即使在灑滿陽光的沙灘上也是。哼！
3. “This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future.”
這篇論文爛到家了。請徹底拒稿，然后封了作者的賬號，免得他日后繼續(xù)投稿。
4. “The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about.”
寫作水平和數(shù)據(jù)展示讓我整個人都不好了，我不得不提前下班，早點回家，甚至開始懷疑人生。
5. “The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.”
這篇稿件的寫作風(fēng)格太糟糕了，審得我都不想活了。
6. “The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student.”
就算回到本科生時期，我都會拒掉這種水平的投稿。
7. “This paper is awfully written. There is no adequate objective and no reasonable conclusion. The literature is quoted at random and not in the context of argument. I have doubts about the methods and whether the effort of data gathering is sufficient to arrive at a useful conclusion.”
這篇論文寫得太爛了。目的不明確，結(jié)論不合理。引文都是亂引的，跟正文的論證完全對不上號。我懷疑這樣的實驗方法，也懷疑他們收集的數(shù)據(jù)不足以得出有效結(jié)論。
8. “Season’s Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days.”
節(jié)日快樂！回復(fù)慢了，真抱歉。有一只烤鵝妨礙我，讓我?guī)滋於紱]顧得上回郵件。
這篇論文讀起來簡直是一種享受，沒有任何意見。這么好的點子我當(dāng)初怎么沒想到！
2. “There was little I could think of to improve this nice paper.”
這篇論文好得我都不知道要怎么改了。
3. “This is as solid a write up as I have seen, many spend much more time and space to say considerably less. It is a perfect example of a compact report.”
這是我見過的最確鑿的報告，許多人花更多時間精力寫出來的比這個差多了。作為一篇翔實的報告，這是一個完美的例子。
4. “landmark paper on P. putida physiology.”
假單胞菌生理學(xué)研究的里程碑
5. “It is always a joy to review manuscripts such as this. Well conceived, well executed, well edited. Clean. Pristine. From start to finish.”
評審這樣的稿件是件人生樂事：構(gòu)思周詳，實施得當(dāng)，寫得漂亮。干凈，純樸，從頭至尾。
原創(chuàng)文章，作者：菜菜歐尼醬，如若轉(zhuǎn)載，請注明來源華算科技，注明出處：http://www.xiubac.cn/index.php/2024/02/19/96272b57d5/