国产三级精品三级在线观看,国产高清无码在线观看,中文字幕日本人妻久久久免费,亚洲精品午夜无码电影网

來源丨學(xué)位與寫作← 關(guān)注Ta

標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的摘要包含五個(gè)要素，分別是問題陳述（背景）、動(dòng)機(jī)（本文目的）、研究方法、結(jié)果（即發(fā)現(xiàn)）和結(jié)論（結(jié)果是否回答了動(dòng)機(jī)，或者研究意義）。這里分享的《頭疼》雜志上一篇關(guān)于該期刊拒稿原因的文章的摘要，按順序介紹了動(dòng)機(jī)、背景、研究方法、結(jié)果和結(jié)論。原文按五個(gè)要素分成了五段，這里的譯文按標(biāo)準(zhǔn)整合成了一段，并將背景放在動(dòng)機(jī)之前，且分屬不同要素的句子使用了不同顏色來區(qū)分。

Chelsea?M?Hesterman?,?Christina?L?Szperka?,?Dana?P?Turner?Headache.?2018??Reasons?for?Manuscript?Rejection?After?Peer?Review?From?the?Journal?Headache，Headache.?58(10):1511-1518?

鏈接?https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30011058/

摘要

人們發(fā)表過許多以拒稿為題材的社論、評(píng)論和研究論文。然而，這些論文很少系統(tǒng)地評(píng)估同行評(píng)審后被拒絕的原因。沒有一個(gè)是專門針對(duì)神經(jīng)病學(xué)或頭痛醫(yī)學(xué)領(lǐng)域的（背景）。本文目的是確定并描述《頭痛》雜志審稿后被拒絕的原因（動(dòng)機(jī)）。我們采用的方法是，對(duì)2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日提交的所有頭痛病例進(jìn)行回顧性分析。對(duì)每份手稿的同行評(píng)審者和編輯評(píng)論進(jìn)行了評(píng)審，并為每份手稿編碼了無限的拒絕理由。拒絕的詳細(xì)原因被分為9大類（方法）。我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，從2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日，共收到784份意見書。其中，336項(xiàng)立即被拒絕，434項(xiàng)繼續(xù)進(jìn)行同行評(píng)審。在此期間，總體拒絕率為62.6%，同行評(píng)議后的拒絕率為35.7%。同行評(píng)審后拒絕的6個(gè)最常見原因是: 方法和研究設(shè)計(jì)的缺陷、方法的不良報(bào)告、不良統(tǒng)計(jì)分析、結(jié)論的夸大、協(xié)變量或結(jié)果的問題以及對(duì)照組或病例組的問題（結(jié)果）。于是，方法和研究設(shè)計(jì)的缺陷是2014-2016年間《頭痛》雜志同行評(píng)審后被拒絕的最常見原因（結(jié)論）。

Abstract

Objective:?To identify and characterize the reasons manuscripts are rejected after peer review from the journal Headache.

Background:?Numerous editorials, reviews, and research manuscripts have been published on the topic of manuscript rejection. However, few of these papers evaluate the reasons for rejection after peer review systematically. None are specific to the field of neurology or headache medicine.

Methods:?A retrospective analysis of all submissions to Headache from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016 was performed. Peer reviewer and editor comments for each manuscript were reviewed, and unlimited reasons for rejection were coded for each manuscript. Detailed reasons for rejection were then grouped into 9 broader categories.

Results:?A total of 784 submissions were received from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016. Of those, 336 were immediately rejected and 434 went on to peer review. During this period, the overall rejection rate was 62.6% and the rejection rate after peer review was 35.7%. The 6 most common reasons for rejection after peer review were: flaws in methodology and study design, poor reporting of methodology, poor statistical analysis, overstatement of conclusions, problems with covariates or outcomes, and problems with the control or case group.

Conclusion: Flaws in methodology and study design were the most common reasons for rejection after peer review from Headache between 2014-2016.

原創(chuàng)文章，作者：菜菜歐尼醬，如若轉(zhuǎn)載，請(qǐng)注明來源華算科技，注明出處：http://www.xiubac.cn/index.php/2024/01/18/1ff1077c09/

国产三级精品三级在线观看,国产高清无码在线观看,中文字幕日本人妻久久久免费,亚洲精品午夜无码电影网

一篇關(guān)于拒稿原因分析的摘要欣賞

相關(guān)推薦